Posts Tagged ‘House’

Global Warming: What are we doing about it? Nothing, it seems!

Sunday, August 1st, 2010

There is more evidence, daily, of the onset of Global Warming. July was the hottest year Ever. Glaciers are melting, Plankton in the oceans are dying. Droughts in some places, floods in others. There is much talk about it and still naysayers, but nothing yet is being done to slow it down.

In spite of Obama talking about Green Energy and some breakthroughs on electric cars and wind and solar power, it seems to be moving in slow motion. Even our Senate keeps putting the Energy Bill on the back burner. Even though investing in new energy would help our economy and put people back to work. Plus we have the GOP Party of No with many naysayers hindering the bill’s passage. From the AP:

US inaction on climate troubles global talks

AMSTERDAM – The failure of a climate bill in the U.S. Senate is likely to weigh heavily on international negotiations that begin Monday on a new agreement to control global warming.

The decision to strike the bill from the Senate’s immediate agenda has deepened the distrust among poor countries about the intentions of United States and other industrial countries to cut greenhouse gas emissions that power their wealthy economies but risk causing the Earth to dangerously overheat, say climate activists.

A split between rich and poor nations has characterized the talks since they began 2 1/2 years ago, but it widened after the disappointment of the Copenhagen climate summit last December that fell short of any binding agreement and produced only a brief document of political intentions.

The withdrawal of the bill to cap U.S. emissions of carbon dioxide, the most prominent gas blamed for global warming, “plays into the same old fault lines,” said Kelly Dent, of Oxfam International. It has let down developing countries that had looked to President Barack Obama’s administration to seize the leadership in climate negotiations, she said Sunday from Bonn, Germany.

Delegations from most of the 194 participating nations begin a five-day negotiating session in Bonn on Monday that is one of the last meetings before another decisive conference convenes at the end of the year in Cancun, Mexico. One more weeklong round of talks is scheduled for October in China.

The two keys to any agreement are commitments by rich countries to cut emissions and their pledges to fund poor countries’ actions to adapt to climate changes affecting agriculture and the frequency of extreme weather events like floods and drought.

So far, Washington has not backed away from its promise at Copenhagen to reduce emissions 17 percent below 2005 levels over the next 10 years. But even that pledge, made more doubtful now by legislative inertia, has been roundly criticized as inadequate. More at link

From Reuters:

Ten key indicators show global warming “undeniable”

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Melting glaciers, more humid air and eight other key indicators show that global warming is undeniable, scientists said on Wednesday, citing a new comprehensive review of the last decade of climate data.

Without addressing why this is happening, the researchers said there was no doubt that every decade on Earth since the 1980s has been hotter than the previous one, and that the planet has been warming for the last half-century.

This confirms the findings of the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which reported in 2007 with 90 percent certainty that climate change is occurring. The IPCC also said that human activities contribute to this phenomenon.

The new report was released after U.S. Senate Democrats delayed any possible legislation to curb climate change until September at the earliest. Prospects for U.S. climate change legislation this year are considered slim.

Released by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration as “The 2009 State of the Climate Report,” the new report draws on the work of 303 scientists from 48 countries, including data from last year.

The 10 key planet-wide indicators of a warming climate identified by the report are:

– Higher temperatures over land

– Higher temperatures over oceans

– Higher ocean heat content

– Higher near-surface air temperatures (temperatures in the troposphere, where Earth’s weather occurs)

– Higher humidity

– Higher sea surface temperatures

– Higher sea levels

– Less sea ice

– Less snow cover

– Shrinking glaciers

The seven indicators expected to rise in a warming world rose over the last decade, the report said; the three indicators expected to decline did so over that same period.

With an almost daily flood of data on climate change, Peter Thorne of the Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites in Asheville, North Carolina, saw the need for a comprehensive look at the information to pick the most obvious signs of planetary warming.

“These are indicators from the top of the atmosphere to the bottom of the ocean that we would expect to be changing in a warming world,” Thorne said at a telephone briefing for reporters.

“Each indicator is changing as we would expect if the world truly were warming,” he said. “Not a single analysis disagrees that the global climate is changing. The bottom line conclusion that the world’s been warming is simply undeniable.”

The entire report can be seen online at http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/bams-state-of-the-climate/2009.php

It’s past time to take this on as a serious issue. Write your Representatives and definitely your Senators to act soon on a Good Bill to start a campaign to combat Global Warming and climate Change.

Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) Goes BALLISTIC Over GOP Opposition

Friday, July 30th, 2010

Finally! Someone with spine enough to go after the the Party of No!

From Sam Stein at Huffington Post:

House Republicans late Thursday were able to corral enough votes to defeat a bill that would have provided up to $7.4 billion in aid to those sickened by toxins resulting from the 9/11 attacks.

In the process, they set off a host of fiery speeches and denunciations from their Democratic colleagues and produced a veritable YouTube moment from Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y), whose district includes many of the affected.

Watch here:

At the heart of the debate was a procedural maneuver made by Democrats to suspend the rules before consideration of the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act. The move allowed leadership to block potential GOP amendments to the measure (there was worry that Republicans would attach something overtly partisan in hopes that it could pass on the otherwise widely-popular measure). It also meant that the party needed a two-thirds majority vote.

When the final tally was announced, there were 255 representatives for the measure, 159 against. The defeat of the bill, which would have provided free health care to those affected during the 9/11 rescue and recovery, likely means that the court system will have to settle compensation issues.

Weiner spoke right before the vote when it was clear that Republican lawmakers would stake their opposition on grounds of procedural concerns. But for the grace of the C-SPAN cameras, he managed to stay physically behind his lectern.

“The gentleman will sit!” he declared at one point, addressing, it is believed, Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.). “The gentleman is correct in sitting!”


—–

Now we need this kind of Spunk in the Senate! It’s past time that the Dems start putting the GOP in their place. This is an example of the lack of simple compassion that the members of the GOP display daily. What amazes me are the people that support this!

Other News:

* GOP GETS ITS WISH:Rangel Trial Set For Campaign Season

* Republicans block small business lending bill

* Wyly Brothers Gave Millions To Over 200 Republican Candidates

* Economic Growth in U.S. Slows Sharply

* July Deadliest Month of Afghan War, for U.S.

War Funds vs Wikileaks

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010

Just like the BP Oil Spill in the Gulf didn’t seem to change the minds of many Congressmen and Senators, the Huge Wikileak dump of documents about the War in Afghanistan didn’t change the minds of many Congressmen and Senators. All but 12 of the Republicans in the House voted for War Funding and we are waiting to see how many Republicans will vote for the Energy Bill since it has been pushed back till after the Summer Recess of the Senate.

From the NY Times on the House Vote for War Funding:

House Approves Money for Wars, but Rift Deepens

The House of Representatives agreed on Tuesday to provide $59 billion to continue financing America’s two wars, but the vote showed deepening divisions and anxiety among Democrats over the course of the nearly nine-year-old conflict in Afghanistan.

The 308-to-114 vote, with strong Republican support, came after the leak of an archive of classified battlefield reports from Afghanistan that fueled new debate over the course of the war and whether President Obama’s counterinsurgency strategy could work.

But Mr. Obama and top military officials said Tuesday that the disclosure of the documents should not force a rethinking of America’s commitment to the war. As Mr. Obama told reporters in the Rose Garden, “While I’m concerned about the disclosure of sensitive information from the battlefield that could potentially jeopardize individuals or operations, the fact is these documents don’t reveal any issues that haven’t already informed our public debate on Afghanistan.”

On a day of continuing political and military fallout over the leaked reports, Pentagon officials said that Pfc. Bradley Manning, 22, an Army intelligence analyst arrested last month on charges of leaking a video of an American helicopter attack in Iraq and charged this month with downloading more than 150,000 classified diplomatic cables, was a “person of interest” in an Army criminal investigation to find who provided the battlefield reports to the group WikiLeaks.

Administration officials said passage of the spending bill, which now goes to Mr. Obama for his signature, showed that the leak had not jeopardized Congressional support for the war and noted that the Senate passed the measure last week with no objection. Democratic leaders in the House said the Congress needed to act to provide the money troops overseas.

“The president is taking a wise and balanced approach in Afghanistan, and it deserves our support,” said Representative Steny H. Hoyer, the Maryland Democrat and majority leader.

In the House vote, 148 Democrats and 160 Republicans backed the war spending, but 102 Democrats joined 12 Republicans in opposing the measure. Last year, 32 Democrats opposed a similar midyear spending bill. Among those voting against the bill on Tuesday was Representative David R. Obey, a Wisconsin Democrat and the chairman of the Appropriations Committee, the panel responsible for the measure.

Some of the Democratic opposition stemmed from the decision by party leaders to strip from the bill money that had been included in the original House version to help address the weak economy at home, including funds to help preserve teachers’ jobs. But some of those voting against it said they were influenced by the leaked documents, which highlight the American military’s struggles in Afghanistan and support claims that elements of Pakistan’s intelligence service were helping the Taliban.

“All of the puzzle has been put together and it is not a pretty picture,” said Representative Jim McGovern, Democrat of Massachusetts. “Things are really ugly over there. I think the White House continues to underestimate the depth of antiwar sentiment here.”

More from this article on the confirmation hearing for the replacement of Gen. Patraeus for Central Command, Gen James Mattis and his views on Wikileaks…..

On another part of Capitol Hill, at a confirmation hearing for Gen. James N. Mattis to lead the military’s Central Command and oversee the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Democrats on the Senate Armed Services Committee pressed General Mattis about the course of the war.

Senator Jack Reed, Democrat of Rhode Island, pointedly asked General Mattis whether he agreed that a July 2011 deadline for the start of American withdrawals from Afghanistan would mean shifting from the current troop-intensive counterinsurgency strategy to an “increasingly important emphasis” on counterterrorism. In other words, should not the United States use the date to begin moving toward a more limited strategy of hunting down insurgents without trying to rebuild Afghanistan? General Mattis quickly agreed.

“I think that is the approach, Senator,” he said.

General Mattis and two Republicans on the panel, Senator John McCain of Arizona and Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, used the occasion to denounce the leaks, which Mr. McCain said were “simply an extended footnote to a well-known reading of recent history.”

General Mattis agreed with Mr. McCain. “One of the newspaper headlines was that war is a tense and dangerous thing,” he said. “Well, if that is news, I don’t know who it’s news to that’s on this planet.”

In his opening statement, General Mattis declared, “Despite any recent papers leaked to the media, we are remaining in the region; we are not leaving.”

General Mattis, who is expected to be confirmed by the committee and the full Senate, is to replace Gen. David H. Petraeus, whose tour at Central Command was cut short when Mr. Obama asked him to take command of the allied mission in Afghanistan after Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal was relieved.

Even with 102 of the Democrats and 12 of the Republicans voting against the funding, it looks like, for now, this war will go on. We need an anti war protest the size of the Viet Nam protest to get through to these “leaders”. And here at home, at least two thirds of this nation is suffering from our economy. Doesn’t make sense. But lately not much does!

Health Insurance Huge Surpluses and Possible Public Option Comeback

Friday, July 23rd, 2010

Health Insurance companies have been raising rates since Health Care Reform, even the non-profits causing a huge surplus. Is this surplus the non-profits are holding too big? From the Washington Post:

Health plans may be raising premiums despite outsize surpluses, watchdog finds

Nonprofit health insurers may be setting aside unnecessarily large surpluses even as some of them continue to raise premiums, according to an analysis by a consumer rights group.

The report released Thursday by Consumers Union, the nonprofit publisher of Consumer Reports, found that seven of 10 Blue Cross Blue Shield affiliates examined had amassed surpluses more than three times the level regulators deemed necessary for them to remain solvent.

For instance at the close of 2009, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Arizona had a surplus of $717 billion, more than seven times the regulatory minimum. The same year the company raised premiums for its individual market customers between 8.8 percent and 18.4 percent.

Similarly, Regence Blue Shield of Oregon had about 3.6 times the regulatory minimum surplus, yet it raised rates on some individual policies an average of 25.3 percent in April 2009 and 16 percent in April of this year, the study found.

An insurance plan’s surplus is essentially the revenue it raises from premiums and investments minus expenses such as the cost of paying medical claims. Companies must maintain enough surplus to protect them from unexpected expenses and losses. But how much surplus is too much is a matter of some debate.

While most states require plans to maintain a minimum level of surplus, only a handful, including Maryland, also monitor whether a nonprofit plan’s surplus is “excessive” and if so, require the company to refund its customers.

For-profit plans are less likely to accumulate surpluses substantially above the required minimum because they have an incentive to give the money back to shareholders as profit, said Sondra Roberto, a staff attorney at Consumer Reports who co-wrote the report.

She worries that such profits may come at the expense of consumers. But Roberto said the prospect that nonprofit plans may be running unwarranted surpluses was even more troubling given their mandate as charitable organizations.  Read More at Link

So the non profits are sitting on money, too much for their needs at the time, and the For Profits are using increases to pay more to stockholders and, of course, to their CEOs while the people that are making less at their jobs and the unemployed are struggling to pay for insurance. Have you seen the cost of COBRA lately?

Meanwhile, in the House…..

Woolsey to introduce ‘robust public option’ bill

By Sahil Kapur
Thursday, July 22nd, 2010 — 8:35 am

WASHINGTON – What, did you think the fight for health care reform was over?

Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-CA), co-chair of the progressive caucus, is making good on her promise to continue pushing for a public health insurance option after the enactment of sweeping reform legislation.

On Thursday afternoon, the Northern California congresswoman will announce the introduction of a bill offering consumers a choice between private plans and a “robust” public plan in the health insurance exchanges set up by the law.

“The robust public option offers lower-cost competition to private insurance companies,” Woolsey told Raw Story. “This will make insurance more affordable for those who do not have it and keep insurance affordable for those who do. We are introducing the public option now so is will be available as a ready-made off set or deficit reducer in this or the next Congress.”

Read More at link

And Ezra Klein report

CBO looks at another public plan proposal:

“CBO estimates that the public plan’s premiums would be 5 percent to 7 percent lower, on average, than the premiums of private plans offered in the exchanges…roughly one-third of the people obtaining coverage through the insurance exchanges would enroll in the public plan…CBO and the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) estimate that the proposal would reduce federal budget deficits through 2019 by about $53 billion.

This would be great if it were allowed to pass in Congress. We know there won’t be any help from the GOP because it seems they want to repeal HCR altogether. We can only hope they fail!

Is it too much to ask for Medicare for all?

Peanut Butter – Cat. 2, Hurricane and Recession, and other things to worry about

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010

Our 1st Atlantic Hurricane of the season is gaining strength in the Gulf:

The storm was expected to pack winds of at least 90 mph when it comes ashore, but those could increase to as much as 110 mph if it strengthened to a Category 2.

And Pew Research has has new poll findings about what happened to our work force in these 30 Months of Recession:

More than half (55%) of all adults in the labor force say that since the Great Recession began 30 months ago, they have suffered a spell of unemployment, a cut in pay, a reduction in hours or have become involuntary part-time workers, according to a new survey by the Pew Research Center’s Social and Demographic Trends Project.

The Republicans seem to be winning over the Dems to weaken, more, the Financial Reform Bill:

In a last-minute scramble, Democratic leaders reopened talks on the legislation after Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) withdrew his support because of a plan to pay for the financial overhaul with a fee on large banks and hedge funds that would raise nearly $20 billion.

To win back Brown’s support – and get the 60 votes needed to overcome a Republican filibuster — the House-Senate conference committee agreed Tuesday to instead end the Troubled Assets Relief Program early and shift some of the bailout effort’s funds toward the financial regulation bill, a move that would yield an estimated $11 billion. The rest would come from raising premiums paid by commercial banks to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., whose fund serves as a safety net for consumers when their banks fail. Only banks with more than $10 billion in assets would pay the higher premium.

And Huff Post’s Arthur Delaney is reporting: Unemployment: Congress Has Never Before Dropped Extended Benefits With Jobless Rate So High. (OPINION: Just goes to show that there is no empathy left in this country and until it effects you or your close family, tuff shit unemployed! Maybe the unemployed should move to India or China and work for pennies a day because that’s where all the jobs are!! What happened to this country? So many bitter, selfish, ugly people!)

John Boehner, Speaker Hopeful, Needs to have his foot surgically removed from his mouth from the interview he gave to the Pittsburgh Tribune yesterday. Here’s just one excerpt of why he wants to raise Social Security retirement age to 70. We have to save from SS to pay for the War:

Ensuring there’s enough money to pay for the war will require reforming the country’s entitlement system, Boehner said. He said he’d favor increasing the Social Security retirement age to 70 for people who have at least 20 years until retirement, tying cost-of-living increases to the consumer price index rather than wage inflation and limiting payments to those who need them.

“We need to look at the American people and explain to them that we’re broke,” Boehner said. “If you have substantial non-Social Security income while you’re retired, why are we paying you at a time when we’re broke? We just need to be honest with people.

And Boehner goes on to say:

Boehner’s criticism of the Democratic agenda then moved to the recently-negotiated financial regulatory reform package, which he likened to “killing an ant with a nuclear weapon.”

Boehner’s second in command is making moves now also. Politico has a report about Eric Cantor’s Ambitions

Despite the GOP’s talk of reversing the Health Care Reform Bill, there’s a new poll by the Kaiser Family Foundation Found that 48 percent of the public had a favorable view of the law in June while 41 percent had an unfavorable opinion. A month earlier, the split was 41 percent favorable to 44 percent unfavorable.

General Patraeus has been confirmed by committee and now goes to the Senate for Confirmation. The confirmation hearings brought up many questions of what our strategy will be in Afghanistan.

And Elena Kagen is on her 3rd day of questions in her confirmation hearing. More reports on the hearings as they come up.

With all the talk about cutting entitlements, here’s some info about Social Security and Medicare, neither an entitlement but Insurance, and both paid for by payroll taxes. This info is in pdf format and is the “CRS Report for Congress” entitled “Social Security: Raising or Eliminating the Taxable Earnings Base”. Interesting history of the program and how changes were made throughout the years.

The powers that be seem to want to mess with these programs so it would be a good idea to get your information and talking points ready.